Musings of an LGBTQ Catholic with a long history of wrestling with his demons
Saturday, May 16, 2009
sexual compatibility survey
i'd like to make a survey. how high up there in your list of must-haves in a relationship is sexual compatibility? do you consider this a major deal breaker? could a relationship last if sexual requirements don't seem to match?
6 comments:
Anonymous
said...
to me, it's as important as intellectual connection. :) so it's pretty high.
is it a deal breaker? not entirely cause i think it should be something partners are able to discuss. if the other isn't even open for discussion, then that's when it becomes a deal breaker.
i think relationships can last without sex, however, it happens over time--when both partners settle for companionship.
overall, passion in the form of sex is something i look forward to in having a relationship. but it's not the be all and end all of the relationship.
I used to be with this guy with whom I was compatible with on so many levels except in bed. I stayed with him for a year but I found myself fooling around behind his back. Rihanna's Unfaithful best summarizes how it felt then.
To each his own but for me, even if I refuse to admit that sex is not THAT important in a relationship, it is. And yes, I'd break it off in an instant if sex is bad.
At the end of the day, what is important is that you do whatever it is that would make you happy.
Ooops, sorry for blogging on your comments page. :D
it is number one. but a few items tie as number one. cause i think for a relationship, it is not just one but a few items that has to be compatible before it will be able to withstand external temptation.
narnian, i share your sentiments! tristan, i dont mind the blog on the comments at all. well, you are a case of one who tried... and failed. hey f. wouldnt looks be part of the sexual attraction? hahaha, m_m... i havent heard of 2 btms who lasted thanks, anonymous one.
6 comments:
to me, it's as important as intellectual connection. :) so it's pretty high.
is it a deal breaker? not entirely cause i think it should be something partners are able to discuss. if the other isn't even open for discussion, then that's when it becomes a deal breaker.
i think relationships can last without sex, however, it happens over time--when both partners settle for companionship.
overall, passion in the form of sex is something i look forward to in having a relationship. but it's not the be all and end all of the relationship.
I used to be with this guy with whom I was compatible with on so many levels except in bed. I stayed with him for a year but I found myself fooling around behind his back. Rihanna's Unfaithful best summarizes how it felt then.
To each his own but for me, even if I refuse to admit that sex is not THAT important in a relationship, it is. And yes, I'd break it off in an instant if sex is bad.
At the end of the day, what is important is that you do whatever it is that would make you happy.
Ooops, sorry for blogging on your comments page. :D
#1 priority. followed closely by looks.
- fenestrations
it is priority.
tanong ko lang, kung 2 tops=espadahan, ano naman sa 2 btms?
it is number one. but a few items tie as number one. cause i think for a relationship, it is not just one but a few items that has to be compatible before it will be able to withstand external temptation.
companionship and sex i think are 2 core ones.
thanks for the comments, people
narnian, i share your sentiments!
tristan, i dont mind the blog on the comments at all. well, you are a case of one who tried... and failed.
hey f. wouldnt looks be part of the sexual attraction?
hahaha, m_m... i havent heard of 2 btms who lasted
thanks, anonymous one.
Post a Comment