active or passive?
giver or receiver?
TOP or BOTTOM?
(kindly deadma the picture, wala lang akong mailagay)
this is a classic case of generation gap. i continue to be shocked when 20somethings ask me this. i never knew till now that penetration is such an integral part of the act. wow. "its like, its not consumated if there's no fucking..."
my take on evolution:
sinaunang panahon - straight "macho" guy and effeminate fag "shoke" (two syllables po). that was the only combination. if you were gay, you were supposed to run after straight guys and get off on either jerking him off or giving him head. and there's no loss of masculinity on their part. and heaven forbid if you start jerking yourself off while blowing him. rarely, he would penetrate you. kissing? hardly. i grew up with this consciousness.
generation ko - gay to gay. pangit pakinggan no? okay MSM men having sex with men. but this time, both of you are homosexual, enjoying mutual sexual satisfaction, heavy petting and kissing ending up in mutual jerk-off or blowjobs, especially the iconic "69". very western, started becoming trendy in the 80's as Coco Banana was in its twilight years. anal penetration was not rampant at all. we all had fun with fellatio.
this generation - still MSM, but with anal penetration as SOP. wow. roles more defined: TOP or BOTTOM, or VERSA (sounds like a car model).
am i complaining? hmmm. kinda. im still not THAT comfortable with anal sex, giving or receiving. i can have great sex without it. and with the AIDS still very much around, putting on rubber has become a chore.
top or bottom? me? VERSA! pero pwede bang kiss-sabay-hug na lang muna?
10 comments:
Hay naku. PeaCOCK. How obvious the picture. ;-)
I'm not really into anal. Top or bottom. I don't do it at all. I haven't found the right guy yet to "de-virginize" me...hehe. I just don't feel the need to have anal sex. This is gonna sound corny...ehem...but I'm saving myself for someone who I truly truly love...(Super corny no?!?!)For now am very much content with oral exchange. Ciao!
Lol. I agree. This generation is very... anally-oriented. Which is a problem for me since I'm still a virgin (many tried, but masyadong masakit eh, so stop sila). Great sex is not defined by how good you go bang-bang, but all the other little details :D
here's a weirder concept i chanced upon while trawling in one of the idiotic postings in g4m forum long ago:
if you are ugly, then you're bottom. if you have smaller dick then you're bottom. or something to that effect; even if you are not bottom by choice.
whoever thought of this moronic rule should be sodomized by a unicorn. or a crazed rhino.
yehey! let the orally fixated band together! joke! nice to know i am not alone. but i aint no virgin either. just... choosy. lol.
hey loud cloud... that posting must be up there on totally stupid comments... pathetic
Totally dig what ur trying to drive at! Anal is messy kasi. tyempo-tyempo lang ang sarap nito. hehe.
Loud Cloud: thing is kung magpapabottom na lng ako, sana man lang yung mas malaki ang titi sakin...my size is not that remarkable so i dont think id enjoy getting fucked with a 4inch penis as thick as tootsie roll di ba? pero yung "if you're ugly then you're bottom" that's a totally fucked up notion. and as for the smaller dick then you're bottom scenario, i have frends who enjoy getting fucked by smaller penises. pero, in essence, it's much nicer to get fucked by someone who has a bigger penis than you. yun ang katotohanan. if it aint, then i should deserve to be whacked in the head with a large trout or soemthing! di ba? =)
suddenly had this comment on "if you're ugly then you're bottom". i wouldnt want to bottom somebody unattractive. i like penetrating face-to-face, not from behind. so i dont think that stupid rule holds.
:-)... it seems to me ur readers here are all virgins, hehehe. para ako (lol!) but true, never been kissed, never been touched! :-) :-(
josh... never as in never? so how do you ah..umm..ah.. release? solo flight?
Post a Comment